Can Protz be applied retroactively?
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its Decision in Dana Holding v. WCAB (Smuck), applying its Protz ruling retroactively.
On June 16, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its decision in Dana Holding Corporation v. WCAB (Smuck). In Dana Holding, the Court addressed the issue of the retroactivity of the Protz v. WCAB (Derry Area School District)
holding in the case at hand. The Defendant/Employer in Dana Holding
had filed an Appeal seeking a clarification as to when new law should be applied retroactively. The Court agreed to hear the Appeal, but on a limited basis, specifically, whether the retroactivity of the Protz
ruling should begin on the date of the IRE or the date of the decision.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court affirmed the Commonwealth Court’s holding that the retroactivity of the Protz
decision dates back to the date of the IRE.
In rendering its Decision, the Supreme Court reviewed the law in various other states and federal districts. The Court noted that there are initially two (2) scenarios when new law is issued: (1) cases that are actively in litigation and the issue(s) is/are preserved throughout the litigation; or (2) applying new law to cases that have become final. Each scenario presents with different results. In Dana Holding, the Court only addressed scenario number 1. As such, the Supreme Court has not addressed scenario number 2.
After reviewing the prior Pennsylvania caselaw on the retroactivity of new law in scenario number 1, the Court held that unless the appellate decision rendering the new law specifically states that it is to be applied prospectively, the new rule of law is to be applied retroactively to cases where the issue in question is properly preserved at all levels of adjudication, including any direct appeal.
Turning to the Dana Holding
case specifically, the Court held that the parties had preserved the constitutionality of the IRE provisions during the litigation of the initial Modification petition. The litigation involving the Modification Petition was ongoing at the time Protz
was issued. Thus, the Court held that the Protz
decision should be applied retroactively to the date of the IRE.
The issue of whether new law should be applied retroactively to final cases is still an open issue.
News & Information
Understand corporate fiduciary duties: the duty of care, the duty of loyalty, and how the business judgment rule protects directors — and when it doesn't.
Where real estate law is heading: emerging technologies, legislative changes on the horizon, and how owners and investors can prepare for what's next.
How subdivision and land development regulations work — planning rules for new development, community consultation, and what legal compliance requires.
Understand trust administration: the trustee's role, managing trust assets, and the legal fiduciary duties and obligations every trustee must uphold.
Stay current on key legal updates in real estate law, including zoning reforms, lease law changes, and new disclosure requirements affecting buyers and sellers.
Plan for incapacity with powers of attorney, healthcare directives, and trusts that protect your finances, health choices, and family from court.
Learn the key differences between revocable and irrevocable trusts, including control, tax implications, asset protection, and which option fits your goals.
Learn the essential clauses every business contract needs — from foundational terms to risk allocation, indemnification, and dispute resolution provisions.
Business succession planning is an important process that helps business owners prepare for the upcoming transfer of ownership and leadership. Whether the transition involves passing the company to family members, selling to business partners or transferring ownership to outside buyers, having a clear succession plan helps reduce uncertainty and protect the long-term security of the business. A careful plan can also minimize disputes, preserve business value and ensure continuity in periods of change. Planning for Business Transfer The first step in business succession planning is identifying how the business will be transferred and who will assume control. Business owners should evaluate their long-term goals, retirement plans, and the financial needs of both the company and their family members. Some owners choose to pass the business on to children or relatives who are already involved in operations. Others may transfer ownership to key employees, business partners or third party buyers. Each option has different legal, operational and financial consequences. A successful transition often takes years of preparation. Potential successors may need leadership training, operational experience and gradual increases in responsibility to ensure they are ready to effectively manage the business. Good communication with family members, partners and stakeholders is also important to avoid misinterpretations and conflict. Business owners should work with legal and financial professionals to create formal succession documents, update corporate records, and establish a realistic timeline for the transfer process. Use of Buy-Sell Agreements Buy-sell agreements are an essential part of many succession plans. These legally binding agreements specify what happens to the interest of a business owner if certain events occur, such as retirement, disability, death or voluntary departure from the company. A buy-sell agreement typically defines who may buy the shares of the departing owner, how the business interest will be valued and the terms of payment. This structure helps maintain stability and prevents ownership disputes that could disrupt operations. For businesses with multiple owners, buy-sell agreements provide understanding and protections for all parties involved. They can prevent unwanted external ownership and ensure that remaining owners retain control of the company. Funding mechanisms are also important. Many businesses use life insurance policies to fund buyouts in the event of an owner's death. This allows surviving owners or family members to complete the transfer without putting financial hardship on the business. Tax Considerations Tax planning is an important part of business succession planning. If the transfer of ownership is not well planned, the business owner and successor will face a substantial tax liability. Depending on how the transfer takes place, the owners may face capital gains, estate, or gift taxes. With good planning, these tax burdens can be reduced with trusts, step-by-step ownership transfers, family partnerships, or changing the type of business entity. Another important factor is valuation. A proper valuation of a business is important for determining tax liability and ensuring that everyone involved in the transfer is treated fairly. Business owners should regularly review their succession plans with accountants, tax advisors, and attorneys, as tax laws are often changing. Regular updates keep the plan in line with changing legislation and the business’s needs. Let Us Help You Navigate the Essentials of Business Succession Planning Don’t wait! Talk to one of the experienced estate planning attorneys at Bingaman Hess today at 610.374.8377 or contact us online. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one may rely on this information without consulting an attorney. Anyone who attempts to use this information without attorney consultation does so at their own risk. Bingaman Hess is not and shall never be responsible for anyone who uses this information. It is not legal advice.