Can Protz be applied retroactively?
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its Decision in Dana Holding v. WCAB (Smuck), applying its Protz ruling retroactively.
On June 16, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its decision in Dana Holding Corporation v. WCAB (Smuck). In Dana Holding, the Court addressed the issue of the retroactivity of the Protz v. WCAB (Derry Area School District)
holding in the case at hand. The Defendant/Employer in Dana Holding
had filed an Appeal seeking a clarification as to when new law should be applied retroactively. The Court agreed to hear the Appeal, but on a limited basis, specifically, whether the retroactivity of the Protz
ruling should begin on the date of the IRE or the date of the decision.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court affirmed the Commonwealth Court’s holding that the retroactivity of the Protz
decision dates back to the date of the IRE.
In rendering its Decision, the Supreme Court reviewed the law in various other states and federal districts. The Court noted that there are initially two (2) scenarios when new law is issued: (1) cases that are actively in litigation and the issue(s) is/are preserved throughout the litigation; or (2) applying new law to cases that have become final. Each scenario presents with different results. In Dana Holding, the Court only addressed scenario number 1. As such, the Supreme Court has not addressed scenario number 2.
After reviewing the prior Pennsylvania caselaw on the retroactivity of new law in scenario number 1, the Court held that unless the appellate decision rendering the new law specifically states that it is to be applied prospectively, the new rule of law is to be applied retroactively to cases where the issue in question is properly preserved at all levels of adjudication, including any direct appeal.
Turning to the Dana Holding
case specifically, the Court held that the parties had preserved the constitutionality of the IRE provisions during the litigation of the initial Modification petition. The litigation involving the Modification Petition was ongoing at the time Protz
was issued. Thus, the Court held that the Protz
decision should be applied retroactively to the date of the IRE.
The issue of whether new law should be applied retroactively to final cases is still an open issue.
News & Information
Learn how to incorporate charitable giving into your estate plan with trusts, tax benefits, and strategies that create a legacy for future generations.
Discover the importance of corporate ethics training, how to implement effective programs, and the legal requirements for whistleblower protections and reporting mechanisms.
Learn how to handle construction litigation involving quality disputes, contract enforcement, and liability issues. Protect your projects with proactive strategies.
Learn the essentials of commercial landlord-tenant law, including rights and duties, lease termination, and how to handle breaches of contract effectively.
Discover the key insurance needs for municipalities, including how to assess risks, choose the right coverage, and manage policies to protect public assets and operations.
Gary specializes in Wills, Estate Planning & Administration, Divorce & Custody, Civil Litigation, Criminal Defense, Real Estate, Municipal and Zoning.
Choose the right executor for your will with confidence. Learn the key qualities to look for, an executor’s duties, and when to seek legal support.
Learn how corporate investigations and compliance audits help address misconduct, evaluate policies, and protect attorney-client privilege during internal reviews.
Explore how alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods like mediation and arbitration help businesses resolve civil disputes efficiently, privately, and cost-effectively.