Can Protz be applied retroactively?
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its Decision in Dana Holding v. WCAB (Smuck), applying its Protz ruling retroactively.
On June 16, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its decision in Dana Holding Corporation v. WCAB (Smuck). In Dana Holding, the Court addressed the issue of the retroactivity of the Protz v. WCAB (Derry Area School District)
holding in the case at hand. The Defendant/Employer in Dana Holding
had filed an Appeal seeking a clarification as to when new law should be applied retroactively. The Court agreed to hear the Appeal, but on a limited basis, specifically, whether the retroactivity of the Protz
ruling should begin on the date of the IRE or the date of the decision.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court affirmed the Commonwealth Court’s holding that the retroactivity of the Protz
decision dates back to the date of the IRE.
In rendering its Decision, the Supreme Court reviewed the law in various other states and federal districts. The Court noted that there are initially two (2) scenarios when new law is issued: (1) cases that are actively in litigation and the issue(s) is/are preserved throughout the litigation; or (2) applying new law to cases that have become final. Each scenario presents with different results. In Dana Holding, the Court only addressed scenario number 1. As such, the Supreme Court has not addressed scenario number 2.
After reviewing the prior Pennsylvania caselaw on the retroactivity of new law in scenario number 1, the Court held that unless the appellate decision rendering the new law specifically states that it is to be applied prospectively, the new rule of law is to be applied retroactively to cases where the issue in question is properly preserved at all levels of adjudication, including any direct appeal.
Turning to the Dana Holding
case specifically, the Court held that the parties had preserved the constitutionality of the IRE provisions during the litigation of the initial Modification petition. The litigation involving the Modification Petition was ongoing at the time Protz
was issued. Thus, the Court held that the Protz
decision should be applied retroactively to the date of the IRE.
The issue of whether new law should be applied retroactively to final cases is still an open issue.
News & Information
Learn about product liability cases, including defective product claims, risk assessments, and effective defense strategies for businesses and legal professionals.
Learn how municipalities can develop effective policies, conduct compliance reviews, and engage stakeholders to ensure regulatory compliance and strong local governance.
Learn the process of probating a will, including how probate works, ways to avoid it, and the role of the probate court in estate administration.
Discover strategic legal guidance for land development, covering approvals, working with local governments, and managing land use challenges to reduce risk.
Learn how clear, effective board governance helps municipal entities meet legal obligations, improve accountability, and strengthen public trust.
Learn how to minimize estate taxes through strategic planning. Explore key exemptions, smart gifting strategies, and the role of life insurance in preserving wealth.
Organizations can manage corporate crises through strategic planning, transparent communication, legal awareness, and lessons from successful crisis responses.
Learn how tort claims arise in business conflicts, including negligence, defamation, and liability assessments, and their impact on risk management and resolution.
Learn how to structure successful real estate joint ventures, from crafting partnership agreements to planning effective exit strategies.